Democracy Fail
Businessmen like to style themselves as the defenders of the free market economy, but as Luigi Zingales, an economist at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, argued, “Most lobbying is pro-business, in the sense that it promotes the interests of existing businesses, not pro-market in the sense of fostering truly free and open competition.

The Self-Destruction of the 1 Percent - NYTimes.com

MUST READ - NOW:))

The first is to channel the state’s scarce resources in their own direction. This is the absurdity of Mitt Romney’s comment about the “47 percent” who are “dependent upon government.” The reality is that it is those at the top, particularly the tippy-top, of the economic pyramid who have been most effective at capturing government support — and at getting others to pay for it.”

The second manifestation of crony capitalism is more direct: the tax perks, trade protections and government subsidies that companies and sectors secure for themselves. Corporate pork is a truly bipartisan dish: green energy companies and the health insurers have been winners in this administration, as oil and steel companies were under George W. Bush’s.”

Not in a swing state? Don’t waste your vote!!!

For the majority of Americans that are not in swing states and know that their state is going to vote red or blue this year, why are you wasting your vote? The election is not about getting to say you voted for the guy who won. America is not about the lesser evil. America is about believing in a better world.

If you know your state is going blue or red, why not vote for a 3rd party and send both corrupt parties a strong message. 

If you’re a Conservative, vote for Gary Johnson (Libertarian) and send your party a message that you believe in true civil liberties and small government, not the blatant lies espoused by the Republicans. In you’re a Ron Paul fan, do you really think the Mittens is a better option than an ex-Republican governor and libertarian?

If you’re a Liberal, vote for Jill Stein (Green) and send your party a message that you believe in true liberal causes, not the blatant lies espoused by the Democrats.

Either way, both Johnson and Stein are against unlimited corporate campaign funding (aka corruption) and this is truly the 1 problem that must be fixed before we can tackle the rest.

I repeat, don’t waste your vote on a team that is already going to win or lose in your state. Instead, use your vote to truly send either party a message.


I love them bears. Here is how the rich and corrupt keep stealing your money and distract you by talking about income taxes.


truth-has-a-liberal-bias:

In light of Mitt Romney’s debate remarks, this needs to be passed around again.

truth-has-a-liberal-bias:

In light of Mitt Romney’s debate remarks, this needs to be passed around again.


Defendants systematically failed to fully evaluate the loans, largely ignored the defects that their limited review did uncover, and kept investors in the dark about both the inadequacy of their review procedures and the defects in the underlying loans.

The office of New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman • Discussing the fraud lawsuit filed against JPMorgan on Monday, regarding defective loans backing securities which allegedly cost their investors billions of dollars. The lawsuit involves a firm which was owned by Bear Stearns, which JPMorgan purchased in 2008 amidst the financial crisis. (JPMorgan would like to emphasize that the charges are “historic” in nature.) The lawsuit is the first action by the the Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Working Group, a task force which is basically going back and taking on the faults that caused the financial crisis — years after the fact. (via shortformblog)

1. Why is fraud not a criminal offense? - because the rich don’t live under the same laws as everyone else

2. Schneiderman is now part of the Obama crew and this is an October Surprise to help Obama get elected. Note that this will result in a tiny settlement with no admission of guilt (as per usual) sometime after the election. This lets Obama say he’s tough on banks while continuing to just fake it.


New Rule: No More Tax Breaks Because of Hostage Threats

We as a country can no longer accept extortion as a rationale for making policy. 

The following bullshit concepts are trotted out by idiots or the corrupt to defend awful and damaging policies. We should not let corporation hold our economy and government hostage.

  • You can’t cut oil subsidies because then they’ll just increase the prices at the pump - Bullshit. We don’t we stop subsidizing the most profitably companies in the world and let them see what happens. With all the money we save on subsidies we might be able to lower taxes on gas if we want to limit costs to consumers. 
  • You can’t stop banks from fraudulently exploiting their customers because then they might start charging for checking accounts - Bullshit. They BofA tried and quickly backpeddled as people can leave banks that try this.
  • You can’t limit executive pay, because we need the super smart people to run our banks - Bullshit, these billionaires led the entire industry and country to bankruptcy and are official now on government welfare via continuous bailouts from the Fed (0% interest loans)
  • You can’t criminally prosecute rich people / banker crimes - Bullshit. This is exactly what is needed to bring back a system where laws apply to everyone and help get away from the pervasive system of moral hazard
  • You can’t let big banks fail, it will bring down the economy - Bullshit, by bailing them out over and over again we have been slowly killing the economy rather than letting the free market get rid of corrupt and bankrupt banks so we can have a clean start without the weight of their greed and idiocy carried on the backs of the tax payers. This is the definition of Moral Hazard.

No more corporate extortion. Bring back law and order.


Romney wants the chance to lock you up without a trial so badly that he won’t go after Obama for doing the same thing

It amazes me just how much Romney and the Republicans agree with Obama on Indefinite Detention of American citizens and a long list of disgusting policies that Obama is pushing.

They must really really agree with Obama, because if they didn’t they could so quickly  at least lie about disagreeing and hammer Obama for attacking individual freedoms. NDAA is a nightmarish law and even Mittens Romney is unwilling to flip-flop on the issue and go after it.

Isn’t that nuts? The people whowant to run the country are so in love with the idea of locking up Americans without lawyers, habeas corpus, due process, etc. that they refuse to even lie about the issue to get elected. Wow.

Both parties are the same corrupt choice. One pretends to be liberal while doing whatever their owners/PACs/banks/etc. ask of them, the other embraces their corruption as a badge of honor. I’m honestly not sure which is worse. Please vote for anyone but Obama/Romney.


lessig:

I’ve been a fan of Congressman Sarbanes (D-MD) (son of Paul Sarbanes) for sometime. I wrote about his Grassroots Democracy work in HuffPo last December. Today, Sarbanes did something critically important for the anti-corruption movement: He introduced, with a significant number of co-sponsors,…


themikebilly:

The next time someone tells you that Congress and the President couldn’t get anything done all year remind them of what happens when those two branches of government do do something.

The only thing a corrupt government can agree on is to be corrupt. Either destroy basic freedom and privacy, or find a way to give more taxpayer money to a corporation (aka “real people”, if they can afford the lobbyisits), or BOTH.
The both category is most common… who says the government can be efficient. Destroy civil liberties and drive up profits for defense contractors at the same time!

Please Vote, just not for either corrupt party. 

themikebilly:

The next time someone tells you that Congress and the President couldn’t get anything done all year remind them of what happens when those two branches of government do do something.

The only thing a corrupt government can agree on is to be corrupt. Either destroy basic freedom and privacy, or find a way to give more taxpayer money to a corporation (aka “real people”, if they can afford the lobbyisits), or BOTH.

The both category is most common… who says the government can be efficient. Destroy civil liberties and drive up profits for defense contractors at the same time!


Please Vote, just not for either corrupt party. 


It is absurd to dismiss Occupy Wall Street as hippies and tell them to get jobs. They are far braver and beneficial to society than those of us with jobs who are too weak and fearful to risk what we have and speak out, protest, get arrested.

Occupy is voicing what people like us are too afraid to say, or even admit to ourselves. This was true a year ago, and the truth becomes no less true b/c the camps are gone. Truth is sunlight on the black hole of corruption at the core of our economy and our government.

If everyone in the country spoke truth to power and backed it up with votes we could change everything.

Many (including myself) made the mistake of looking to a single person/hero to lead us, but that is not possible. The solution is in the 99% admitting how broken all levels of the system are, putting aside our petty differences and unifying to bring down corruption.

Occupy is not about wall street alone. Big business and our government are one in the same now. Business has co-opted government so that it serves their profits and not the people. This is the definition of fascism.


“He who controls the internet, controls the data. And he who controls the data controls the future”

Both corrupt parties agree that your privacy and free speech are no longer yours. Unless you are a corporation or super rich, you no longer have rights. Those that have the money will be above the law.

This is incredibly well done, insightful and fun.


Matt Taibbi Wrote A Massive Take Down Of Mitt Romney’s Time At Bain — Here Are The Most Damning Points

mitt romney bain capital

We knew Matt Taibbi was working something, we didn’t know that it was about Republican Presidential nominee,Mitt Romney.

More specifically, it’s about Romney’s time at Bain and how he earned his fortune— something his campaign hasn’t necessarily been completely transparent about. The piece is called ‘Greed and Debt: The True Story of Mitt Romney and Bain Capital’, and it’s this month’s Rolling Stone cover story.

The piece is long, and of course, written in classic Taibbi style, so it goes fast, but we pinpointed 10 points that we found shocking/damning overall.

Here we go:

Mitt Romney decries the national debt, but his career was made by running up debt on companies on their last lifeline.

“The result has been a brilliant comedy: A man makes a $250 million fortune loading up companies with debt and then extracting million-dollar fees from those same companies, in exchange for the generous service of telling them who needs to be fired in order to finance the debt payments he saddled them with in the first place. That same man then runs for president riding an image of children roasting on flames of debt, choosing as his running mate perhaps the only politician in America more pompous and self-righteous on the subject of the evils of borrowed money than the candidate himself. If Romney pulls off this whopper, you’ll have to tip your hat to him: No one in history has ever successfully run for president riding this big of a lie. It’s almost enough to make you think he really is qualified for the White House.”

Mitt Romney shirked military service.

“I longed in many respects to actually be in Vietnam and be representing our country there,” he claimed years after the war. To a different audience, he said, “I was not planning on signing up for the military. It was not my desire to go off and serve in Vietnam.”

Mitt Romney’s Bain was using the same trick as two-bit mobsters — the ‘bust out’.

“This business model wasn’t really “helping,” of course – and it wasn’t new. Fans of mob movies will recognize what’s known as the “bust-out,” in which a gangster takes over a restaurant or sporting goods store and then monetizes his investment by running up giant debts on the company’s credit line. (Think Paulie buying all those cases of Cutty Sark inGoodfellas.) When the note comes due, the mobster simply torches the restaurant and collects the insurance money. Reduced to their most basic level, the leveraged buyouts engineered by Romney followed exactly the same business model. “It’s the bust-out,” one Wall Street trader says with a laugh. “That’s all it is.”“

Mitt Romney coldly rebuffed a worker who wrote him a hand-written letter asking Romney to save his job.

“Romney has always kept his distance from the real-life consequences of his profiteering. At one point during Bain’s looting of Ampad, a worker named Randy Johnson sent a handwritten letter to Romney, asking him to intervene to save an Ampad factory in Marion, Indiana. In a sterling demonstration of manliness and willingness to face a difficult conversation, Romney, who had just lost his race for the Senate in Massachusetts, wrote Johnson that he was “sorry,” but his lawyers had advised him not to get involved. (So much for the candidate who insists that his way is always to “fight to save every job.”)”

He loves to manipulate people, even his own employees.

“Over the years, colleagues would anonymously whisper stories about Mitt the Boss to the press, describing him as cunning, manipulative and a little bit nuts, with “an ability to identify people’s insecurities and exploit them for his own benefit.” One former Bain employee said that Romney would screw around with bonuses in small amounts, just to mess with people: He would give $3 million to one, $3.1 million to another and $2.9 million to a third, just to keep those below him on edge.”

Mitt Romney’s Bain still got paid, even when it’s acquisitions were floundering.

“In a typical private-equity fragging, Bain put up a mere $18 million to acquire KB Toys and got big banks to finance the remaining $302 million it needed. Less than a year and a half after the purchase, Bain decided to give itself a gift known as a “dividend recapitalization.” The firm induced KB Toys to redeem $121 million in stock and take out more than $66 million in bank loans – $83 million of which went directly into the pockets of Bain’s owners and investors, including Romney. “The dividend recap is like borrowing someone else’s credit card to take out a cash advance, and then leaving them to pay it off,” says Heather Slavkin Corzo, who monitors private equity takeovers as the senior legal policy adviser for the AFL-CIO.”

Mitt Romney’s Bain financed one of its first takeover deals, with department stores Beals Brothers and Palais Royale with money dirtied by Michael Milken.

“…one of Romney’s first LBO deals, and one of his most profitable, involved Mike Milken himself. Bain put down $10 million in cash, got $300 million in financing from Milken and bought a pair of department-store chains, Bealls Brothers and Palais Royal. In what should by now be a familiar outcome, the two chains – which Bain merged into a single outfit called Stage Stores – filed for bankruptcy protection in 2000 under the weight of more than $444 million in debt…But here’s the interesting twist: Romney made the Bealls-Palais deal just as the federal government was launching charges of massive manipulation and insider trading against Milken and his firm, Drexel Burnham Lambert. After what must have been a lengthy and agonizing period of moral soul-searching, however, Romney decided not to kill the deal, despite its shady financing. “We did not say, ‘Oh, my goodness, Drexel has been accused of something, not been found guilty,’ ” Romney told reporters years after the deal. “Should we basically stop the transaction and blow the whole thing up?”“

Mitt Romney’s Bain sidled Dunkin’ Donuts with crushing debt.

“In 2010, a year after the last round of Hertz layoffs, Carlyle teamed up with Bain to take $500 million out of another takeover target: the parent company of Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin-Robbins. Dunkin’ had to take out a $1.25 billion loan to pay a dividend to its new private equity owners. So think of this the next time you go to Dunkin’ Donuts for a cup of coffee: A small cup of joe costs about $1.69 in most outlets, which means that for years to come, Dunkin’ Donuts will have to sell about 2,011,834 small coffees every month – about $3.4 million – just to meet the interest payments on the loan it took out to pay Bain and Carlyle their little one-time dividend. And that doesn’t include the principal on the loan, or the additional millions in debt that Dunkin’ has to pay every year to get out from under the $2.4 billion in debt it’s now saddled with after having the privilege of being taken over – with borrowed money – by the firm that Romney built.”

Mitt Romney’s fortune was gained by gaming the government.

“Which brings us to another aspect of Romney’s business career that has largely been hidden from voters: His personal fortune would not have been possible without the direct assistance of the U.S. government. The taxpayer-funded subsidies that Romney has received go well beyond the humdrum, backdoor, welfare-sucking that all supposedly self-made free marketeers inevitably indulge in.”

Mitt Romney ran a super wasteful Olympics.

“Not that Romney hasn’t done just fine at milking the government when it suits his purposes, the most obvious instance being the incredible $1.5 billion in aid he siphoned out of the U.S. Treasury as head of the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake – a sum greater than all federal spending for the previous seven U.S. Olympic games combined. Romney, the supposed fiscal conservative, blew through an average of $625,000 in taxpayer money per athlete – an astounding increase of 5,582 percent over the $11,000 average at the 1984 games in Los Angeles.”


Must Read Rolling Stone article on Romney/Bain

Some favorite quotes:

Romney used language that was literally inflammatory to describe America’s federal borrowing. “A prairie fire of debt is sweeping across Iowa and our nation,” he declared. “Every day we fail to act, that fire gets closer to the homes and children we love.” Our collective debt is no ordinary problem: According to Mitt, it’s going to burn our children alive.” …

And this is where we get to the hypocrisy at the heart of Mitt Romney. Everyone knows that he is fantastically rich, having scored great success, the legend goes, as a “turnaround specialist,” a shrewd financial operator who revived moribund companies as a high-priced consultant for a storied Wall Street private equity firm. But what most voters don’t know is the way Mitt Romney actuallymade his fortune: by borrowing vast sums of money that other people were forced to pay back”

He’s Gordon Gekko, but a new and improved version, with better PR – and a bigger goal. A takeover artist all his life, Romney is now trying to take over America itself. And if his own history is any guide, we’ll all end up paying for the acquisition.”

let’s say you make tricycles in Alabama – has been taken over by a bunch of slick Wall Street dudes who kicked in as little as five percent as a down payment. So in addition to whatever problems you had before, Tricycle Inc. now owes Goldman or Citigroup $350 million. With all that new debt service to pay, the company’s bottom line is suddenly untenable: You almost have to start firing people immediately just to get your costs down to a manageable level.” …Fortunately, the geniuses at Bain who now run the place are there to help tell you whom to fire. And for the service it performs cutting your company’s costs to help you pay off the massive debt that it, Bain, saddled your company with in the first place, Bain naturally charges a management fee, typically millions of dollars a year.”

To recap: Romney, who has compared the devilish federal debt to a “nightmare” home mortgage that is “adjustable, no-money down and assigned to our children,” took over Ampad with essentially no money down, saddled the firm with a nightmare debt and assigned the crushing interest payments not to Bain but to the children of Ampad’s workers, who would be left holding the note long after Romney fled the scene. ”

That conflict will be between people who live somewhere, and people who live nowhere. It will be between people who consider themselves citizens of actual countries, to which they have patriotic allegiance, and people to whom nations are meaningless, who live in a stateless global archipelago of privilege – a collection of private schools, tax havens and gated residential communities with little or no connection to the outside world.” … “Romney helped pioneer is to move money into the archipelago from the places outside it, using massive amounts of taxpayer-subsidized debt to enrich a handful of billionaires. It’s a vision of society that’s crazy, vicious and almost unbelievably selfish, yet it’s running for president, and it has a chance of winning.

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/greed-and-debt-the-true-story-of-mitt-romney-and-bain-capital-20120829#ixzz24xvA1hgO


Go here and see who you side with. I’m guessing most Americans are not actually democrat or republican.
This is without acknowledging how utterly corrupt those two parties are at this point. 

Go here and see who you side with. I’m guessing most Americans are not actually democrat or republican.

This is without acknowledging how utterly corrupt those two parties are at this point. 


Despite a mainstream media blackout on the topic, the alternative media is abuzz with this week’s hearing on the constitutionality of the clearly unconstitutional NDAA.  In case you don’t remember, section 1021 of the NDAA, which Obama signed into law on December 31 of last year, allows the government to lock up U.S. citizens indefinitely without a trial.  At the time of signing, Obama penned a pathetic letter to many of his outraged supporters where he basically said he signed it but he won’t use it.  Thanks pal!

In any event, the Administration is showing its true colors by appealing an injunction that judge Katherine Forrest issued against it in May.  The injunction was in response to the lawsuit filed by Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Chris Hedges and others.  While the NDAA clearly vaporizes the 5th and 6th Amendments of the Constitution, I believe the real target is the 1st Amendment.  By having a law on the books that allows the government to arbitrarily lock anyone up and throw away the key, the government is actually trying to instill enough fear in people that they self-censor speech and become too afraid to criticize the criminal elite political and economic oligarchy.

This is what is wrong with Obama. He’s not a communist/socialist, he’s a fascist. The reason the Republican’s aren’t going after him about this is because they like the idea and can’t wait till they get to use it.

It is absurd that this isn’t the most important story in the media, but of course, it’s also not surprising…